The festival included a free music concert with headliners Erykah Badu, Sarkodie, Tobe Nwigwe, T Pain, Asakaa Boys, M.anifest, and Chance and Vic, along with panel discussions with some local cultural figures and artists and an incredibly controversial keynote conversation between Chance the Rapper and Black American comedian Dave Chapelle, who had come under criticism for his flippant transphobic commentary and disingenuous “I have a trans friend so I can’t be transphobic” responses to said criticism. Chappelle’s appearance came at a time when one year prior, the Ghanaian government arrested 21 queer people and advocates for unlawful assembly in support of LGBTQ rights and Uganada had passed their outright criminalization of homosexuality.
Differences in power of passport, currency, cultural attitudes, the hegemony in education, and material conditions cannot be passed over. Our Blackness is not enough to “unify.” Historical gatherings rooted in reconnection between Africa and its diaspora have infamously excluded queer people and women in the vision of a connected Africa and its descendants.
The Year of Return and all its complexities drew mixed emotions from local Ghanaians. While mainstream press, both local and international, was largely positive and focused on the economic benefits of tourism, public critique of its effects or the general efficacy of addressing a 400-year history of slavery was and is much less visible. Critique was nestled in X (formerly Twitter) and in the lived experiences of Ghanaians who endured mildly irritating to life-threatening encounters with those looking to return. It became clear that the project of Pan-Africanism could not be executed by the vehicle of capitalism; exchange predicated on investment as a remedy to colonial extraction and colonial debt resulted in many visitors coming and going and locals experiencing immense inflation
The Ghanaian government has been incredibly friendly to Western foreigners, with many Black American celebrities doing photo ops with the president, while the cost of living, the conditions of roads, the access to clinics, or a myriad of other basic service-delivery issues persist, making Ghana very sweet for some and incredibly sour for others.
These dynamics feature in literature, such as Kobby Ben Ben’s No One Dies Yet. In the novel, the two main narrators, Kobby and Nana, are met with a group of three Black American tourists arriving for the Year of Return, all of whom are queer men. Kobby narrates through experience; he knows the type. The kind of “expat” that comes to reconnect with similar scripts of “Why did you sell us?,” “You don’t know the pain of not knowing your home,” and “I want to see the ‘real’ Accra or the ‘real’ queer scene,” all while armed with Saidiya Hartman’s Lose Your Mother for the slave castle visits. As an aspiring writer, Kobby is often subjected to rejections for his thriller novels, with publishers asking for “something more like Yaa Gyasi’s Homegoing” or anything that has to do with Ghana’s colonial history. Nana welcomes the three men and also understands the language of access and money but does not critique it. Nana, unlike Kobby, is more traditional and religious and tries to sway the visitors away from queerness. Nana goes out of his way to treat the group with hospitality and diligence in hopes they may donate to his church or secure an imagined visa. The Year of Return acts as a stage to demonstrate the many versions of “us” versus “them,” in which gentrification and unequal access feature heavily. Return at what cost? Nearly everything that is already precarious.
Pan-Africanism is robust, with varying sects and historical understandings. Dr. Layla Brown notes that Pan-Africanism in practice is an objective and not strictly a philosophy, with the objective being a united but not uniform Africa. She acknowledges that there were iterations of this objective before the transatlantic slave trade, but in a contemporary setting, Pan-Africanism addresses and incorporates the creation of diaspora via the slave trade. However, masculinist interpretations tend to be forefronted in this canon of thinking and organizing. This version of Pan-Africanism that drives events like the Black Star Festival or the Year of Return falls short of the objective. The language of reconnection, unity, and exchange result in reified asymmetry.
What gets lost in the pursuit for reconnection is the question: Who is on the other side?
When looking at Black canons of film, literature, or art, one finds that while many diasporans speculate romantically about the people we were or could have been, that speculation is not mutual. You may extend a hand, but there might not be a person across that door (of no return). When the expectation of reconnection is ruptured by this reality—that others may not be searching for us in the ways we are abstractly searching for them—there is an opportunity to reconfigure our perception and see others for who they are instead of what they could be or, importantly, what answers they might hold for us.
The truth one has to face is that there are plenty of people who are not interested in the reconnection process and do not share this void of disconnection. If anything, far more people are antagonized by it.
What does reconnection offer “us”?
Who is included in the ideal “us”?
I had the privilege of time to consider and confront these questions, as I was on a one-month residency (which turned into a two-month stay in Ghana) with the Library of Africa and the African Diaspora (LOATAD). The Black Atlantic Residency hosted 12 writers over the course of three months.
As I prepared for my arrival in Ghana, I held onto Dionne Brand’s words:
“I cannot go back to where I came from. It no longer exists. It should not exist.”
I knew I was not returning. I was going to see for myself. I repeated the words like a song. However, it took me some time to learn the melody.