Africa Is a Country

First as tragedy, then as farce

First as tragedy, then as farce

By
Sean Jacobs

South Africa prematurely celebrating qualification to the 2012 African Cup of Nations championship is another case of history repeating itself when it comes to the administration of football in the country.

Bafana Bafana celebrates a rare goal.

The final round of group qualifying matches for the 2012 African Nations Cup tournament in Gabon and Equatorial Guinea were played this weekend. The big news: Nigeria, Cameroon, Algeria and Egypt were knocked out and small footballing nations Botswana, Libya and Sudan qualified. The weirdest plot line, however, came in Group G.

There South Africa, Sierra Leone and Niger all ended tied in first place, all with 9 points. Egypt was already eliminated with 5 points. On Saturday night the South Africans played to a goalless draw with an ascendant Sierra Leone (the latter’s form surprised everybody). At that same time, in Cairo, Egypt’s under 23 selection beat Niger 3-0.  South Africa had beaten Egypt 1-0 and played to a goalless draw when they met in home and away group fixtures. South Africa also had the best goal record and so assumed they qualified.  At full time vs Sierra Leone, the South Africans -believing they’d qualified – started celebrating wildly; the players even taking a victory lap. However, CAF (the controlling body for football on the continent) soon brought an end to that when it cited some obscure competition rule by which Niger would be declared group winners.  Basically, in terms of the rule 14 of the competition, at the end of group play if three teams shared the top spot,  they would formed a new mini-league and CAF only considered results of head-to-head matches between those teams, i.e. Niger, South Africa and Sierra Leone. In terms of this formula Niger finished with 6 points and South Africa and Sierra Leone with 5. Niger therefore qualified to the final phase.

It’s complicated.

The South Africans now say they’ll appeal the ruling, but it looks more like saving face with the supporters.

The rub is that this is another case of history repeating itself when it comes to the South African national football team.  Remember the 2002 World Cup in Japan/Korea when South Africa let Spain and Paraguay decide their fate on the final day of group matches. This also happened in their final group match of the 2010 World Cup when they stopped playing after scoring 2 goals (they needed 4 unanswered goals) against a demoralized France.

Here’s the list of final participants for CAN 2012: The hosts Gabon and Equitorial Guinea (who qualified automatically), Botswana, Cote d’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Ghana, Guinea, Zambia, Angola, Tunisia, Mali, Niger, Morocco; Libya and Sudan

Further Reading

Not exactly at arm’s length

Despite South Africa’s ban on arms exports to Israel and its condemnation of Israel’s actions in Palestine, local arms companies continue to send weapons to Israel’s allies and its major arms suppliers.

Ruto’s Kenya

Since June’s anti-finance bill protests, dozens of people remain unaccounted for—a stark reminder of the Kenyan state’s long history of abductions and assassinations.

Between Harlem and home

African postcolonial cinema serves as a mirror, revealing the limits of escape—whether through migration or personal defiance—and exposing the tensions between dreams and reality.

The real Rwanda

The world is slowly opening its eyes to how Paul Kagame’s regime abuses human rights, suppresses dissent, and exploits neighboring countries.

In the shadow of Mondlane

After a historic election and on the eve of celebrating fifty years of independence, Mozambicans need to ask whether the values, symbols, and institutions created to give shape to “national unity” are still legitimate today.

À sombra de Mondlane

Depois de uma eleição histórica e em vésperas de celebrar os 50 anos de independência, os moçambicanos precisam de perguntar se os valores, símbolos e instituições criados para dar forma à “unidade nacional” ainda são legítimos hoje.